In conversations with hospital boards and C-suite leaders, a question frequently raised is: “Given such difficult operating circumstances, why are some hospitals successfully managing through – and others are not?”
A post-Covid statistical analysis revealed that ongoing financial success was significantly correlated to accelerating outpatient revenue, quickly lowering contract labor costs and rapidly decreasing average lengths of stay. These were the critical operating strategies of the post-Covid moment — but each required exceptional and timely organizational decision-making.
In short: leadership directing the hospital to the right operational answers.
But where does this kind of leadership come from? And why do some leaders seem well-matched to current challenges while others struggle? These are perplexing questions — and recently, Stanford Business School professor Charles O’Reilly began to explore one important piece of the answer: how a CEO’s personality may shape organizational culture and, ultimately, performance.
What the research suggests
O’Reilly and his colleagues studied more than 300 companies and uncovered two key insights:
- A CEO’s personality significantly influences organizational culture, which in turn shapes performance.
- There is no single “ideal” personality for a CEO — instead, different situations call for different leadership styles.
These findings don’t necessarily point to a need for new leadership — but they do offer a way to think about how leadership shows up in an organization. They provide a lens for leaders and boards alike to consider how the current leadership approach — in style, instincts and team dynamics — aligns with the organization’s most urgent strategic needs.
That alignment may look very different depending on the organization’s strategic environment. And that raises a critical reflection: Is the organization’s current leadership style — not just who is in place, but how they lead — fit for the strategic reality it faces today?
Where self-awareness meets strategy
If personality influences culture — and culture drives execution — then perhaps one of the most valuable leadership practices is intentional self-awareness.
Consider the following questions:
- When facing tough financial decisions, is the instinct to act quickly or seek broader consensus?
- In partnership conversations, is the approach one of mediation, or decisive alignment?
- When new ideas emerge, are they met with curiosity or cautious scrutiny?
These are not diagnostic tools, nor are they grounds for judgment. They are starting points for understanding how natural leadership tendencies may influence culture, communication and the pace of decision-making.
Different contexts call for different strengths
O’Reilly’s research suggests that different strategic contexts benefit from different leadership styles. Here’s one way to consider how different traits align with different challenges:
| Strategic goal | Helpful personality traits | Example behaviors |
|---|---|---|
| Turnaround | Emotionally stable Conscientious | Calm, consistent communication Operational discipline under pressure |
| Growth | Extraverted Open to experience | Publicly championing bold vision Encouraging experimentation and partnerships |
| Integration | Agreeable Collaborative | Building trust during mergers Unifying clinical cultures post-acquisition |
This isn’t a formula — it’s a frame. No one leader embodies all traits. And crucially, this is not about replacing leadership. It’s about asking a more productive question: “How do we build leadership teams that complement one another and align with the necessary strategy ahead?”
Because no strategy is permanent, this reflection must be ongoing. A system may move from turnaround to growth, or from integration to innovation. What worked before may not work next — and leadership must be prepared to shift with it.
Team dynamics as a strategic strength
Few leaders succeed in isolation. The most resilient and effective organizations are often those where the leadership team has been intentionally constructed — with diverse instincts, complementary styles and a shared commitment to mission.
This invites thoughtful reflection:
- Has the team been built to stretch and balance the leader’s perspective?
- Are voices around the table empowered to challenge and enhance key decisions?
- Is culture being shaped deliberately – or left to emerge by default?
Aligning leadership to strategic context
Hospitals today face mounting financial pressure, persistent workforce shortages, shifting competitive dynamics, regulatory uncertainty and rising demands for patient access and engagement. Why are some hospitals managing through today’s difficult circumstances while others continue to struggle? Often, it comes down to leadership — but not leadership in the abstract. It’s about fit — the right leadership for the organization’s current reality.
And that reality continues to shift. A leader who’s highly effective in a turnaround may not be the ideal fit for a growth phase. Someone wired for clinical integration may not naturally lead innovation or strategic expansion. As the organization’s priorities evolve, so must its leadership approach – to get to the right operational answers.
This isn’t solely a board-level or executive responsibility — it’s a shared one. Executives must reflect on how they lead, and boards must continually assess whether leadership remains well matched to the strategy ahead.
Long-term success hinges on a single question: Is our leadership approach aligned with what the organization needs now — and prepared for what comes next?
The First Requirement of a High Performing Healthcare Organization: Providing Timely Appointments
Implications of the National Hospital Flash Report for Hospital Operations
